5 Reasons Spreadsheet-Based Evidence Tracking Fails Under DPDPA

Share:

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) has raised the bar for how organizations manage, document, and demonstrate data protection and privacy compliance. Yet many organizations still rely on spreadsheets to track policies, assessments, controls, and compliance evidence. While spreadsheets may work for basic record-keeping, they can quickly become difficult to manage as DPDPA compliance requirements grow.

Spreadsheet-based evidence tracking creates several challenges. Evidence can become outdated while still appearing complete, manual updates can result in missed actions and inconsistencies, and the lack of real-time visibility makes it difficult to understand the current compliance posture. Scattered evidence can also slow down audits and make validation more challenging. Without clear ownership and accountability, organizations may struggle to determine who is responsible for maintaining specific evidence and addressing compliance gaps.

A structured and centralized approach to DPDPA compliance management can help organizations maintain accurate, current, and audit-ready evidence. Automated evidence tracking can improve visibility, establish accountability, streamline compliance workflows, and reduce the risks associated with manual processes.

Enjoyed reading this infographics? Stay updated with our latest exclusive content by following us on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Ampcus Cyber
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Talk to an expert

Leave a Reply